Friday 25 March 2011

Owners and unions extend IBF piracy high risk area


Owners and unions extend IBF piracy high risk area
(Mar  25  2011) 

Following in depth discussion among the parties of the International Bargaining Forum (IBF), a new agreement was reached for vessels/seafarers trading in the Gulf of Aden, Arabian Sea and North Indian Ocean regions.

It will come into effect on 1st April 2011, allowing ship operators time to make any necessary preparations to follow the new agreement. In essence, The Joint Negotiating Group (JNG) and the International Transport Workers Federation (ITF) agreed extend the geographical coverage of the IBF High Risk Area and terms and conditions applying in the area as follows:
1. With effect from 0001Z on 1st April 2011 the Extended Risk Zone is - the western border of the zone runs from the coastline at the border of Djibouti and Somalia to position 11 48 N, 45 E; from 12 00 N, 45 E to Mayyun Island in the Bab El Mandeb Straits.
The eastern border is set at 78 E, the southern border is set at 10 S and the Northern Border set at 26 N.
2. The IBF constituents have agreed that during a vessel’s transit of the Extended Risk Zone protection of seafarers through the provision of increased security measures should be adopted. Such measures must be above the latest Best Management Practice (BMP) level and may include the provision of personnel or systems, which appropriately reduce the vulnerability of a vessel.
The sufficiency of such extra security measures should be determined depending on vessel type, size, freeboard during transit and speed, with consulting and seeking advice of respective ITF union(s) where necessary.
3. The IBF constituents confirm that the adoption of BMP is required of all vessels operating under IBF agreements as a minimum standard of protection.
4. Within the Extended Risk Zone the IBF constituents agree to retain the previously designated IBF High Risk Area as it is recognised that the pirate attacks emanate mainly from bases in this region. The Western Border of this High Risk Area runs from the coastline at the border of Djibouti and Somalia to position 11 48 N, 45 E; from 12 00 N, 45 E to Mayyun Island in the Bab El Mandeb Straits.
The Eastern Border runs from Rhiy diIrisal on Suqutra Island to position 14 18 N, 53 E; from 14 30 N, 53 E to the coastline at the border between Yemen and Oman, together with a 400 mile zone off the eastern coast of Somalia, ie from Suqutra Island down to the Kenyan border to the South.
5. During the period of transit of the area designated as the IBF High Risk Area, seafarers shall be entitled to compensation amounting to 100% of the basic wage and a doubled compensation payable in case of death and disability. This entitlement should apply on each day of the vessel’s stay in the High Risk Area.
6. In the case of vessels that will transit the IBF High Risk Area outside of the east bound and west bound lanes created under the International Recommended Transit Corridor (IRTC), seafarers have the right not to proceed with the passage.
In such an event, the seafarer concerned shall be repatriated at the company’s cost with benefits accrued until date of return to the port of engagement. This entitlement shall only apply in respect of vessels which are bound to enter the IBF High Risk Area and will not apply in case of crossing the rest of the Extended Risk Zone.
7. Vessels may deviate from the International Recommended Transit Corridor (IRTC) lanes without affecting the terms and conditions for the seafarers on board for collision avoidance purposes only, as long as they are returned to the original lanes as soon as it is safe and practicable to do so.
8. During the period of transit of the IBF Extended Risk Zone, outside the area which is designated as High Risk Area, each seafarer shall be entitled to a bonus equal to 100% of the basic wage and a doubled compensation in case of injury or death on any day during which, the vessel he serving on is attacked.
The proof of these entitlements shall be subject to a confirmed entry into the ship’s log book and a report of attack being lodged with recognised international reporting authorities, such as UK MTO. The maximum period when these entitlements may apply shall not exceed the number of days of the vessel’s transit of the IBF Extended Risk Zone outside the area designated as High Risk Area.
9. The IBF constituents believe that, in order to assist the military efforts to counter piracy in this region, all vessels that are subject to a confirmed attack should report to international navies present in the area, or other relevant authority, to assist in the deployment of naval resources to appropriate areas, where piracy attacks are occurring.
10. Within all of the IBF Extended Risk Zone, including the High Risk Area, the above identified entitlements to double basic pay and double compensation for injury or death will not apply while vessels are alongside a berth, at anchor in secure anchorages off ports, or attached to SBM facilities with exception of Somali waters and ports.
It is understood that vessels will have to transit the high risk area in order to proceed to certain ports and as such the bonuses mentioned in above should cease when a vessel is either all secure alongside, brought up to her anchor or fully coupled to a SBM in any port of the IBF Extended Risk Zone, excluding Somalia.
Likewise when sailing, the applicability of bonuses etc should commence when the vessel is “all gone”, ie the last line is let go from a berth, when the anchor is aweigh, or a vessel has decoupled from a SBM.
11. This Revision of the IBF High Risk Area remains in force from 0001Z on 1st April until any further revision or amendment is adopted by the parties of the IBF.

Thursday 24 March 2011

Chemical Tankers - Shipping Document & Cargo Information


This post is to remind you that you are required to ensure that the shippers provide you the necessary cargo related information in at least one of the shipping documents with respect to Chemicals / NLS coming under the purview of IBC Code – Chapter 17. Please inform the Chief Mate’s too in order to be able to get the same information.

---------------------------------
IBC Code
16.2 Cargo information
16.2.1 A copy of this Code, or national regulations incorporating the provisions of this Code, shall be on board every ship covered by this Code. PLEASE CONFIRM
16.2.2 Any cargo offered for bulk shipment shall be indicated in the shipping documents by the product name, under which it is listed in chapter 17 or 18 of the Code or the latest edition of MEPC.2/Circ. or under which it has been provisionally assessed. Where the cargo is a mixture, an analysis indicating the dangerous components contributing significantly to the total hazard of the product shall be provided, or a complete analysis if this is available. Such an analysis shall be certified by the manufacturer or by an independent expert acceptable to the Administration.
MEPC.2/CIRC. IS PROVIDED IN THE APPENDIX 2 OF THE CHEMICAL TANKER OPERATIONS MANUAL (SUNCE CTOM). IF THIS IS TO BE REFERRED YOU ARE REMINDED BY THIS MAIL WHERE YOU’LL FIND THIS INFORMATION.

16.2.3 Information shall be on board, and available to all concerned, giving the necessary data for the safe carriage of the cargo in bulk. Such information shall include a cargo stowage plan, to be kept in an accessible place, indicating all cargo on board, including each dangerous chemical carried:
.1 a full description of the physical and chemical properties, including reactivity, necessary for the safe containment of the cargo;
.2 action to be taken in the event of spills or leaks;
.3 countermeasures against accidental personal contact;
.4 fire-fighting procedures and fire-fighting media;
.5 procedures for cargo transfer, tank cleaning, gas-freeing and ballasting; and
.6 for those cargoes required to be stabilized or inhibited, the cargo shall be refused if the certificate required by these paragraphs is not supplied.
THIS SIGNIFIES THE IMPORTANCE OF MSDS BEING AVAILABLE PRIOR TO LOADING THE CARGO AND ALSO A PROPER AND ACCURATE CARGO PLAN & LOADING PLAN.


16.2.4 If sufficient information, necessary for the safe transportation of the cargo, is not available, the cargo shall be refused.
PLEASE DO NOTE THIS. YOU’RE NOT WRONG, IF YOU REFUSE TO LOAD. IT IS STATUTORY OBLIGATION, BESIDES SAFETY OF YOU AND YOUR CREW.

16.2.5 Cargoes which evolve highly toxic imperceptible vapours shall not be transported unless perceptible additives are introduced into the cargo.

16.2.6 Where column o in the table of chapter 17 refers to this paragraph, the cargo’s viscosity at 20°C shall be specified on a shipping document, and if the cargo’s viscosity exceeds 50 mPa.s at 20°C, the temperature at which the cargo has a viscosity of 50 mPa.s shall be specified in the shipping document.
PLEASE ENSURE THIS IS LOOKED AT DURING INITIAL CARGO PLANNING TO BE AWARE AND THE INFORMATION IS TAKEN FROM THE SHIPPERS WHERE REQUIRED BY IBC CODE CH.17

16.2.7 Deleted.
16.2.8 Deleted.
16.2.9 Where column o in the table of chapter 17 refers to this paragraph, the cargo’s melting point shall be indicated in the shipping document.
PLEASE ENSURE THIS IS LOOKED AT DURING INITIAL CARGO PLANNING TO BE AWARE AND THE INFORMATION IS TAKEN FROM THE SHIPPERS WHERE REQUIRED BY IBC CODE CH.17

ISM July 2010 Amendments


As most of you are aware that new ISM Code amendments have come in force from 1st of July 2010, and we expect that all our vessels are having the 2010 Edition of the ISM Code on board. Below is a summary of the amendment features with implications as per our understanding. Hope the vessels shall, under the able guidance of the Management Team be able to understudy the same and bring about the change in the systems as we need on board today. This can be one of the topics for the Master’s Management Review in future, for which, the Master’s and vessel Management can choose independently.


Summary of amendments to the ISM Code 2010 Amendments & Implications
Details of the specific amendments to the relevant provisions of the ISM Code are attached to this guidance notice. In summary, the amendments include:

1)     Changing the definition of “major non-conformity” – this gives a less restrictive definition of a major non-conformity.

This implies in basic sense, that any deficiency identified as a Major Non Conformity, needs to be resolved or downgraded prior to the vessel leaving port. All other normal deficiencies would have a due date for maximum 3 months to resolve.
This further implies that even a lack of effective & systematic implementation of a SMS element or any element as in the ISM Code will be also treated as a Major Non-conformity.

It goes on to understand from here that lack of awareness of the ISM Code and / or the Company’s SMS is the first Major Non-conformity.

2)     Adding “assess all identified risk to its ships” in the objectives of the Safety Management of the Company.

We’ve been all doing jobs on board, sometimes with a risk assessment, mostly without one. ISM Code now requires the company to identify and assess and provide for all identified risks to its ships. While a lot has been taken care of in the SMS, plenty of Risk Assessments are made up and included in the SUNCE Cds sent to your vessels, together with a power point presentation how to carry out Risk assessment. Further, please note, that any job being done on board, which comes under the purview of the Permit to Work system, needs to have a Risk Assessment done prior commencing the work. While we understand that most of the risks can be mitigated or reduced by the ships alone, we still expect the vessels to keep office in concurrence, whenever a job that is being done, does not have an adequate guidance in the QMS Manual. Further the policy regarding hot work stands as it is. Outside the designated areas, all hot work being done, needs office approval.


3)     Adding a periodical review of the SMS as a master’s responsibility (previously masters were only required to review the SMS with no periodic requirement given).

Earlier the review of company’s SMS was supposed to be done, but no period was required. It was left on Master’s, unless the company comes up with a period in its SMS. All Master’s on board SUNCE Vessels are reminded, that prior your sign off, you together with the vessels management is required to do a Management Review of the SMS. This would include all aspects of the SMS. The SMS tiers are based on a PDCA cycle (PDCA (plan-do-check-act) is an iterative four-step problem-solving process typically used in business process improvement).

Tier 1:  PLAN: 
This is described by the Company Mission Statement and Establish the objectives and processes necessary to deliver results in accordance with the expected output. By making the expected output the focus, it differs from other techniques in that the completeness and accuracy of the specification is also part of the improvement. This would mean the company Goals and Policies.

Tier 2: DO:
Implement the new processes. This would mean all the SMS documentation, in our case the QMS Manual for the Ships, and the Company QPM in the office, supported by various other manuals – that is the Emergency Procedures Manual (EPM), Ship Security Plan (SSP) etc.

Tier 3: CHECK:
Measure the new processes and compare the results against the expected results to ascertain any differences.
This tier would mean Operations – Manuals, PMS, Circulars, fleet alerts etc. which would directly deal with the aspect of vessel general operations, basis the type of vessel and exact measures to process them, quantify and carry out the requirements.
This would further encompass all forms and Checklists that are to be used for Operations – in our Case, all SUNCE Checklists & Forms, except the  MG, SP, QMS & SF labeled forms.

Tier 4: ACT:
Analyze the differences to determine their cause. Each will be part of either one or more of the P-D-C-A steps. Determine where to apply changes that will include improvement. When a pass through these four steps does not result in the need to improve, refine the scope to which PDCA is applied until there is a plan that involves improvement. This includes the aspects within the QMS that deal with Management Review, and the forms and checklists used to carry out the same.
All the above constitutes the company’s SMS and everything is under the purview of Management Review.

4)     Adding “measures intended to prevent recurrence” in the procedure for the implementation of corrective action reflecting the need to put in place both corrective and preventative actions.
Until now, we were getting half hearted attempts from vessels with respect to their responses to deficiencies on board, be it in the SMS or in the Crew documentation or on board the vessels. However, with the implementation of the amendments to ISM Code, this would no longer suffice.
Root Cause analysis is mandatory, Corrective Actions need to be reported and placed immediately. Preventive Measures have to noted and undertaken to prevent any more recurrence.

5)     Requiring companies to identify equipment and technical systems for which sudden operational failure may result in a hazardous situation (previously, companies were only required to establish a
procedure for this).
This implies a risk assessment type of module to be developed for identifying all such equipment and technical systems that may result in to a hazardous situation, if they fail. We at SUNCE are in the process to establish one such procedure, in order to ensure that nothing is left behind. Any suggestions and as such, any identifications from the Ship board personnel is welcome.

6)     Setting a mandatory internal audit frequency of one year (previously the requirement had been for internal audits and periodic assessment of the efficiency of the SMS).

7)     Introducing a need for the company to assess the effectiveness of the SMS, rather than its efficiency.
This is one of our most unfortunate area. Some how, we at SUNCE believe that we’ve endeavored to make an efficient SMS. However we’ve been finding mostly that due to some reasons, it is not effective. While we are trying to identify the root cause for this, we hope the onboard management team shall help us to identify this. In some of the Master’s Management reviews, we’ve come across Master’s writing that they’ve no problems with the SMS, and that it is good. We here are very well aware that they don’t know it in the first place. The causes are yours. One of the reasons we’ve definitely identified is behavioral responses from the personnel in question. Attitudinal changes are required. We understand that we do not have the best of the vessels, however, we at SUNCE office have taken this as a challenge to convert them to good running vessels. We expected support from most of the personnel serving on board, hoping that professionalism will prevail and they’ll enable us to meet our objective. Surprisingly while some vessels have done extremely well, we still have some vessels where the attitude of persons on board needs a change or such persons should be “written off”. Masters that are the eyes of the owners, have to support us in identifying such personnel. Further they have to support us by using the training medium, use the training material in SUNCE Cds and try to create more professional attitude on board.

8)       Introducing possible 3 months extension of certificate, if a ship is not in a port (including change in the certificate form).
For this, please see above.

The Definitions, when elaborated with Respect to deficiencies:

1.1.4 "Safety management system" means a structured and documented system enabling Company personnel to implement effectively the Company safety and environmental protection policy.
1.1.7 "Objective evidence" means quantitative or qualitative information, records or statements of fact pertaining to safety or to the existence and implementation of a safety management system element, which is based on observation, measurement or test and which can be verified.
1.1.8 "Observation" means a statement of fact made during a safety management audit and substantiated by objective evidence.
1.1.9 "Non-conformity" means an observed situation where objective evidence indicates the non-fulfilment of a specified requirement.
1.1.10 "Major non-conformity" means an identifiable deviation that poses a serious threat to the safety of personnel or the ship or a serious risk to the environment that requires immediate corrective action or the lack of effective and systematic implementation of a requirement of this Code.


Sent to Sunce Vessels on the 06th July 2010
Rajesh Baran

Vettings & Inspections


The following guidelines and explanations are to address some of the issues being observed by me.

A) AUDITS & NON CONFORMITY
During conducting audits on board few of our vessels, we have come across several deficiencies pertaining to vessels not using the SUNCE current forms and checklists, and the awareness about the company’s QMS manual & Emergency Procedures Manual is negligible. It becomes glaring, when even senior officers are unable to answer simple questions on the systems.

This has further caused non-implementation of the systems and thus deficiencies and Non conformities are galore.

One of the simple questions that most are unable to answer is what is a Non Conformity.
The explanation is here under with Example:

Non-conformity: Means an observed situation where objective evidence indicates the non-fulfilment of a specified requirement
Major Non-Conformity: Means an identifiable deviation that poses a serious threat to the safety of personnel or the ship or a serious risk to the environment that requires immediate corrective action and includes the lack of effective and systematic implementation of a requirement of the ISM Code

Example: Let’s assume, on board a vessel, after discharging cargo, the Master advises Chief Officer to carry out tank cleaning and thereafter decant water from slops and discharge into sea through ODME.
The chief officer does the tank cleaning, and when goes about to start the ODME, he is unable to start the ODMCS.

Example: The ODME has developed a fault, and needs to be repaired prior to use.

As much as most of the people would say that this is a Non-conformity, please note this is not a  Non Conformity. A Equipment can malfunction.

But let’s further assume that the Chief Officer does not know how to use it, and he has further never tried out the ODMCS as required by Company procedures every month for the past three months. Thus there is no evidence that adequate checks and inspections were carried out as required.

Here the Non-Conformity Develops. The Objective Evidence – no print-outs can be shown, no ORB entries can be shown to justify that the Chief Officer ever tried it out. The specified Requirement is that ODME must be tried out monthly, which was not fulfilled.

This leads to a Glaring non-Conformity. The gravity of the Non-conformity is set by the evaluation of the threat. If it causes serious risk to Safety, Health or Environment, it will be called a Major non-conformity.
(As in the above case, the Master takes over from Chief Officer and with non working ODME on auto mode, bypasses the Automatic settings, and decants the water manually, it will turn to a Major Non-conformity).

The key word are
“OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE” –                   REQUIRES DOCUMENTATION.
“SPECIFIED REQUIREMENT” –           COMPLIANCE WITH COMPANY’S SMS & PROCEDURES, ALWAYS IN LINE WITH REGULATIONS.
“NON-FULFILLMENT” –                     EVIDENCE MISSING THAT THE SHIP & ITS PERSONNEL COMPLY WITH THE SYSTEMS & REQUIREMENTS.
The non-fulfillment can be further tracked down to two reasons:
1)       The documentation has been done accurately, but while auditing, the auditor find out that the personnel doing it have no idea of what they are doing. They are doing only “tickology”. That is they are not familiar with the requirements, but because someone told them to follow something / a pre-existing system has been continued without use of actual analytical abilities which stand-out to display the competence of the person doing it.
2)       No documentation or carrying on with an out-dated system / pre-existing system. This goes to show that the personnel are not aware of the latest. Not a healthy sign, because apart from analytical abilities it shows the characteristics of observance and awareness levels in the person.
Therefore, it is important for you to familiarize actually with the system and use the company forms and checklists, where available to maintain documentation / evidence or make your own documented evidence if no standard form or checklist is provided from the company. This should also be brought to attention of the company in a Master’s Management Review.


B) LOG BOOK ENTRIES
The CCR / Cargo / Port Record book  or log book and the Bell Book complement the entries in the Deck log book. Please note, that these two log books are the equivalent of Rough note books, where except for erasing / cutting data or writing with pencil, everything is permissible. It is like a scrape note book, where, if you feel that you should write about the most insignificant event, you should write.
These entries in Cargo log book should include (not limited to) entries pertaining to
*       timings of visitors on board,
*       personnel going ashore,
*       change of cargo tanks, during loading & discharging,
*       Change of Cargo pumps
*       Deck and pumproom rounds and the result of the rounds.
*       Ballasting / deballasting commencement, change-over of ballast tanks & completion
*       Matters relating to change in parameters of pumping any time and manifold pressures
*       Any other abnormal occurrence if suspected.
*       Specific communication with terminals / port on VHF or Radio
*       Instructions from terminal during loading / discharging
*       Stoppages & resumption.
*       Ship shore meeting timings and other timings considered important
*       Timings related to small barges, provision boats etc. alongside, entry / exit of surveyors or inspectors
*       Testing / inspection of cargo gear, pre-arrival checks, loadicator tests.
*       Timings and procedure of tank cleaning
*       Records related to ballast handling.
*       Etc.
Similarly every item of smallest detail should be entered in the Bell Book, when in use on bridge.

The items that seems important in the above should be further also noted down in the Deck log Book (Also refer to the inside cover page of Deck / Engine log book), including;
*       Important timings
*       Training events (the record of this can be kept in the Bell book also), including drills.
*       Reference to SUNCE forms and checklists, which are applicable, having been completed and complied.
*       Reference to vessel position & activity (during cargo operation “ loading Gas Oil alongside Ulsan, XYZ Terminal, Jetty # 2 & during navigation, GPS or Radar position) at least once every watch
*       Maintenance / Inspection Record of any equipment, which is related to Safety, Environmental Protection etc.
*       Record of Master’s weekly rounds in the accommodation, to check for hygiene and cleanliness (Must be at least once every week).
*       Cargo quantity loaded / discharged, departure / arrival drafts and/or freeboard.
*       Crew sign on / sign off
*       Result of Stress & Stability Checks prior departure
*       Ballasting / Deballasting
*       Use of ODME etc.

C) TRAINING
Onboard training should not only be limited to Drills. It must also include and be documented adequately for training of junior ranks to the next rank, trainings and familiarization with shipboard specific equipment, safety or otherwise.
Evidence of training should be kept for each person on board. 


D) REPORTING / CLOSING OUT INTERNAL / EXTERNAL AUDIT OBSERVATIONS, NON CONFORMITIES, DEFICIENCIES REPORTED BY SUPERINTENDENT OR VESSEL PERSONNEL, VETTING OBSERVATIONS ETC.
Whenever the vessel gets / finds such an observation or report of deficiencies from own observation or from third party observations, such as PSC, Flag state, Vettings etc., they should within the shortest possible time send to office, siting the observations, source of observations, root cause as identified by Master / Vessel Management and the corrective action required with Preventive Action towards closing the same permanently.
Proper Root Cause must be analysed and submitted for each observation or NC.

The observations will be followed up from office by the superintendents with their remarks and as and when the observations are closed, they should be reported to office with physical evidence, such as scanned documentary evidence, photographs etc. as applicable. Sending a requisition does not close the observation, until it is received on board and put to use to close the observation.

Once the office sites the evidence, the superintendent would close the same and advice the vessel in the same form. This must be done within 14 days of a vetting inspection as that is the lead time in most cases to reply to a vetting observation to the oil majors.

G) VETTING INSPECTIONS & AUDITS
Vetting Inspection is carried out as follows:
1)       The Inspector boards the vessel and starts making his first opinion of the vessel basis the presentation of the visitor card on gangway, ISPS Checks and the way the accommodation ladder is kept to the general condition of the deck and the housekeeping in and out of the accommodation.
2)       The inspector should be escorted straight to the Master. Normal salutations like Good Morning etc., make an objective impression on the Inspector about the satisfaction level of the people on board.
3)       The Inspector would normally call an opening meeting with senior officers to brief them how he would want to carry out the inspection. The Master can and should care for the rest hours of his officers and accordingly advice the Inspector, if he wants him to call for eg. 2nd officer later or earlier in order to provide him adequate rest. This shows that Master Cares for the rest of his people. Another good impression.
4)       The Inspector would now want to check documentation and ships certificates with Master. He should be provided with a list of certificates with date of expiry & issuance (SUNCE.MA.02 Vessel Certificates Status.xls) to facilitate him with the inspection. The orderliness of the certificates and the ease of finding them would make the inspector happy.
5)       Further, the inspector should be provided with a copy of the Crewlist, a copy of the HVPQ, key dates regarding maintenance, inspection & launching of lifeboats, drills etc., a copy of the officer’s Matrix updated, ship’s particulars, a copy of any Condition of class, a declaration of last three cargoes with the ROB after discharge stated and the Minimum Manning certificate copy.
6)       All officers and crew certificates, national and flag.
7)       Keep the certified copies of Intact & Damage Stability manuals, IGS manual, ODME Manual, P&A Manual, loadicator manual etc. ready for inspection.
8)       Ensure you provide the maximum attention to the comfort of the Inspector and arrange tea/coffee or snacks for him, and keep checking if he wants more.
9)       Oil Record books and garbage log book.
10)    Once completed with Master, the inspector would like to go on Bridge. He’ll call for 2nd Mate. Please ensure the guidelines in the QMS Chapter 9 are observed.
*       Ensure Master’s standing orders are posted
*       Updated magnetic compass deviation card, matching with the current compass error log, which must have latest error observations
*       GMDSS log with entries related to maintenance / inspections, and all distress / urgency / safety communication received, even if not responded owing to outside the vessel’s reach, or if within vessel’s area, should have the entry, why vessel did not proceed for help.
*       Echo Sounder log, GPS Log & Anchoring records updated
*       Current passage plan, which must include references to all charts and publications that have been referred or can be referred to make the plan. For example in Singapore reference should also be made of BA Chart 5502. These publications and charts should be kept out and easily accessible to all, neatly arranged and securedly kept. The markings on the charts for the previous plans should not be erased until it has been inspected by the Inspector.
*       Ensure that the voyage charts have been checked that all Notices are corrected, marked on the chart and in the chart correction log, including the references of all Temporary & Preliminary notices applicable and marked on chart.
*       All Navtex / EGC print-out must be read & signed by all watchkeepers including Master.
*       Watchkeeping Schedule should be posted.
*       All other log books must be properly completed.
*       2nd officer should be aware of the UKC policy of the company.
*       All bridge checklists including Master pilot information and pilot card are properly filled & filed.
*       Alcohol test equipment available & evidence of Master having carried out the same regularly.
*       Company policies displayed on bridge. So it should be also in the ECR & other alley ways. The Drug & Alcohol policy should be in all alleyways and common rooms.
*       The record of LSA, FFA & Training & Drills should accessible and to be presented to him immediately.
*       Bridge equipment maintenance record should be present.
*       Ensure there are no alarms on bridge. Not too much paper printed out on any printer – Sat-C or Navtex / Weather Fax.
*       Emergency contact list should be available in SOPEP & on bridge and in CCR.
11)    The Inspector thereafter may want to take a round on deck, starting from accommodation. While he is with Master, the chief officer and Chief Engineer should get the deck and engine room and all other areas re-verified that everything is in order.
12)    Ensure the Garbage area is properly maintained and kept clean.
13)    ensure all stenciling is done, more is acceptable less is not. Every sounding pipe or vent on deck should be stenciled properly.
14)    Ensure Rescue boat and Lifeboat is properly kept, ready & clean, tried out. Liferafts are properly connected with the HRU.
15)    The inspector may request the operation of the following equipment:
*      Emergency Fire Pump
*      Emergency Generator
*      Lifeboat / Resuce boat engine
*      Emergency Steering
*      ODME
16)    No lighters should be used. Only match boxes. Ashtrays should be of closed type and only visible in the approved smoking areas, door of which should be kept closed.
17)    Proper PPE is in use.
18)    No evidence of any leakage.
19)    Manifold pressure gauges working on both sides. All unused manifolds shut (comply with Ship shore safety checklist)
20)    Samples are properly kept in sample locker.
21)    Ensure deck air is on, and wilden pumps have been tested.
22)    Paint stores, chemical stores, sample locker etc. must have MSDS & PPE.
Then he would like to go to Engine Room
23)    Ensure no leakages.
24)    All MARPOL seals are in place and record is maintained
25)    Ensure emergency & Fire fighting equipment are inspected and in readiness.
26)    Ensure emergency air compressor is fully charged and ready.
27)    Ensure no earth alarms are present. All such equipment must be traced and switched off if required & possible during inspection, if time does not permit to mitigate.
28)    Insulation mats present at switch boards.
29)    Must be able to calibrate the OWS.
30)    Chemical MSDS & PPE is placed at Chemical store.
Then comes Chief officer
31)    Must be aware of pressure settings of IG / PV Valves & Pressure alarms
32)    Must be able to calibrate the gas measuring equipment
33)    Should have the full cargo loading / discharging plan ready. See Cargo Module A – Sunce forms CT.04 A/B/ C/D as applicable.
34)    Hourly log of loading & discharge should be in use & maintained. (SUNCE.CT.10 Hourly log of cargo discharge.xls)
35)    Ship shore safety checklist should be complied with, with repeated checks for Items marked R.
36)    MSDS is available in Mess room, CCr, Bridge & ECR.
37)    Record of Cargo samples has been kept.
38)    Chief officer must be aware of the dangers if the IG is not used.
Finally remember, should you feel that the inspector may give some deficiency that he has observed, please try to rectify them before he leaves the vessel.
0-6 OBSERVATIONS (UNLESS HIGH RISK)                        100% OIL MAJOR ACCEPTANCE
6-10 OBSERVATIONS (UNLESS HIGH RISK)                     80% OIL MAJOR ACCEPTANCE
10 – 15 OBSERVATIONS (UNLESS HIGH RISK)                60% OIL MAJOR ACCEPTANCE
16 – 20 OBSERVATIONS (UNLESS HIGH RISK)                40% OIL MAJOR ACCEPTANCE
ABOVE 20: VERY LESS CHANCES                                       ALMOST NIL.

The charterers or Oil Majors are looking for the reason why the business should come to you and they are looking for reasons whether the display by ship staff during inspection is temporary or will it be continued. Will there cargo be safe even in future with them?

Below is a list of common deficiencies observed:

Common Vetting Deficiencies
A
Safety
1
Non - conformities of internal audit not closed out.
2
Safety signs such as emergency escape route signs posted too high.
3
Launching of lifeboats and rescue boats as per statutary requirements overdue.
4
Self igniting lights for lifebuoys not approved for use in hazardous area i.e. not intrinsically safe.
5
Imo symbols not posted at various places.
6
Safety officer has not done safety officer course.
7
Enclosed space entry permits not followed and / or entries wrongly filled.
8
SCBA air quality test overdue.
B
Deck & Cargo
1
MSDS not available for the cargo being loaded.
2
Gangway net not rigged properly.Net found secured around stanchions.
3
Oil spill gear in poor condition.
4
Eye wash / emergency shower  not working / damaged.
5
Poor housekeeping on deck and in stores.
6
Sea chest integrity test gauge is not compound type.No records of integrity tests.
7
Mooring rollers , bollards , fairleads , chokes not marked with SWL.
8
Mooring pedestal rollers found frozen.
9
No spares on board for single exhaust fan for pump room.
10
Scuppers loosely fitted.
11
Containment system (Save alls) plugs missing.
12
Fire wires not rigged properly.
13
More than one layer of mooring rope on split drums.
14
Proper PPE not worn by ship staff.
15
Pressure vacuum alarm settings in CCR were wrongly set / Not familiar with procedure to change settings.
16
No terminal regulations available while loading / discharging.
17
Ballast pumps seals found leaking.
C
Navigation
1
Charts and publications not corrected upto date.
2
Navtex , Navarea , T & P notices not filed properly and not plotted on trading charts.
3
Only one mean of position fixing i.e. GPS used during passage.
4
Navigating officers not attended BTM / BRM , ECDIS courses.
5
Passage plan not made from berth to berth.
6
UKC for passage and ports not calculated as per company requirements.
7
Speed input in radar for anti-collision was not through the water.
D
Engine room
1
Calibration checks of portable thermometers not done.
2
Calibration checks of pressure guages not done.
3
No warning signs and / or no seals on emergency bilge suctions.
4
Poor house keeping.
5
Earth fault observed on main switch board.
6
No approved insulation mat present in front of electrical switchboards.
7
Leaks noticed from various machineries.
E
Accommodation
1
Accommodation under negative pressure (vacuum).
2
Galley exhaust dirty with cooking fat.
3
Light fittings around accommodation containing water.
4
Garbage bins and drums without noncombustible lid.Garbage bins and drums not made of non-combustible material.
5
Expired or No medical chest certificate.
6
First aid boxes missing from place or containing expired medicines.
7
Poor house keeping , provision freeze room frozen food not on gratings ,lying on floor.
F
Documentation
1
Annual inspection of lifting gears not recorded in lifting gear register.
2
Survival crafts and launching appliances weekly and monthly inspections not logged in log book.
3
Oil record book part 1 not filled up correctly.
4
Fire wire certificates not on board.
5
Work hour - rest hour records not complying with actual work hours / rest hours.
6
Senior officers not done ship handling course.
7
LSA and FFA maintenance register not maintained and inadequate information

Please note the above is some of the major things we would really appreciate that you and your staff considers and follows. Only acknowledging receipt is not sufficient. During audits it has been seen that most of the vessels are not using the checklists / forms, no one knows the systems, but all Masters have acknowledged having received them. Probably some of you are doing it also, but we’d rather wish that you’re sure then sorry later.

Sent to Sunce Vessels / 12Jun10 - Rajesh Baran